On Wed, 03 Jun 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > From: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Chromebooks can have more than one Embedded Controller so the > cros_ec device id has to be incremented for each EC registered. > > Add a new structure to represent multiple EC as different char > devices (e.g: /dev/cros_ec, /dev/cros_pd). It connects to > cros_ec_device and allows sysfs inferface for cros_pd. > > Also reduce number of allocated objects, make chromeos sysfs > class object a static and add refcounting to prevent object > deletion while command is in progress. > > Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Changes since v4: > - Use cros-ec-name DT property instead of devname. Suggested by Lee Jones. > - Pass PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO directly to mfd_add_devices(). > Suggested by Lee Jones. > - Add Heiko Stuebner tested-by tag. > - Fix get_version by passing the cmd_offset to EC_CMD_GET_VERSION. > > Changes since v3: > - Add defines for the EC and PD index constants. > - Remove cros_ec_dev_register() and declare the mfd_cells as static structs. > Suggested by Lee Jones. > > Changes since v2: None > > Changes since v1: > - Squash patch that adds support to represent EC's as different > char devices (e.g: /dev/cros_ec, /dev/cros_pd): > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/217297/ > Suggested by Gwendal Grignou > - Use cros_ec instead of cros-ec in the subject line to be consistent. > Suggested by Gwendal Grignou > --- > drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c | 2 +- > drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c | 57 +++++++++++-- > drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c | 1 - > drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 1 - > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_dev.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_dev.h | 7 -- > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lightbar.c | 75 +++++++++-------- > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c | 1 - > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sysfs.c | 48 +++++------ > include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h | 44 ++++++++-- > 10 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c > index 974154a74505..b01966dc7eb3 100644 > --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c > +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c > @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static int cros_ec_keyb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > ckdev->dev = dev; > dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, ckdev); > > - idev->name = ec->ec_name; > + idev->name = CROS_EC_DEV_NAME; > idev->phys = ec->phys_name; > __set_bit(EV_REP, idev->evbit); > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c > index 08d82bfc5268..6935f385992e 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c > @@ -24,11 +24,27 @@ > #include <linux/mfd/core.h> > #include <linux/mfd/cros_ec.h> > > -static const struct mfd_cell cros_devs[] = { > - { > - .name = "cros-ec-ctl", > - .id = PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, > - }, > +#define CROS_EC_DEV_EC_INDEX 0 > +#define CROS_EC_DEV_PD_INDEX 1 > + > +struct cros_ec_platform ec_p = { > + .cmd_offset = EC_CMD_PASSTHRU_OFFSET(CROS_EC_DEV_EC_INDEX), > +}; > + > +struct cros_ec_platform pd_p = { > + .cmd_offset = EC_CMD_PASSTHRU_OFFSET(CROS_EC_DEV_PD_INDEX), > +}; > + > +struct mfd_cell ec_cell = { > + .name = "cros-ec-ctl", > + .platform_data = &ec_p, > + .pdata_size = sizeof(ec_p), > +}; > + > +struct mfd_cell ec_pd_cell = { > + .name = "cros-ec-ctl", > + .platform_data = &pd_p, > + .pdata_size = sizeof(pd_p), > }; > > int cros_ec_register(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev) > @@ -52,14 +68,39 @@ int cros_ec_register(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev) > > cros_ec_query_all(ec_dev); > > - err = mfd_add_devices(dev, 0, cros_devs, > - ARRAY_SIZE(cros_devs), > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) > + ec_p.ec_name = of_get_property(dev->of_node, > + "google,cros-ec-name", NULL); NACK You either need to obtain this another way, or have a chat with the DT Maintainers and explain why this platform is special enough to break the normal conventions. HINT: I different compatible string is normally more amenable, but this will also require a DT ACK for me to take it through. > + if (!ec_p.ec_name) > + ec_p.ec_name = CROS_EC_DEV_NAME; > + > + err = mfd_add_devices(ec_dev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, &ec_cell, 1, > NULL, ec_dev->irq, NULL); > if (err) { > - dev_err(dev, "failed to add mfd devices\n"); > + dev_err(dev, "failed to add ec\n"); Might be nice to expand 'ec' so your users have half a chance in deciphering what just went wrong. [...] -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |