On Wed, 03 Jun 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Lee, > > Thanks a lot for your feedback. > > On 06/03/2015 10:53 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 02 Jun 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > > >> From: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Chromebooks can have more than one Embedded Controller so the > >> cros_ec device id has to be incremented for each EC registered. > >> > >> Add code to handle multiple EC. First ec found is cros-ec0, > >> second cros-ec1 and so on. > >> > >> Add a new structure to represent multiple EC as different char > >> devices (e.g: /dev/cros_ec, /dev/cros_pd). It connects to > >> cros_ec_device and allows sysfs inferface for cros_pd. > >> > >> Also reduce number of allocated objects, make chromeos sysfs > >> class object a static and add refcounting to prevent object > >> deletion while command is in progress. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> Changes since v3: > >> - Add defines for the EC and PD index constants. > >> - Remove cros_ec_dev_register() and declare the mfd_cells as static structs. > >> Suggested by Lee Jones. > >> - Add a new line before the return statement in cros_ec_dev_register(). > >> Suggested by Lee Jones. > >> > >> Changes since v2: None > >> > >> Changes since v1: > >> - Squash patch that adds support to represent EC's as different > >> char devices (e.g: /dev/cros_ec, /dev/cros_pd): > >> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/217297/ > >> Suggested by Gwendal Grignou > >> - Use cros_ec instead of cros-ec in the subject line to be consistent. > >> Suggested by Gwendal Grignou > >> --- > >> drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c | 2 +- > >> drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c | 59 +++++++++++-- > >> drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c | 1 - > >> drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 1 - > >> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_dev.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- > >> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_dev.h | 7 -- > >> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lightbar.c | 75 +++++++++-------- > >> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c | 1 - > >> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sysfs.c | 48 +++++------ > >> include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h | 44 ++++++++-- > >> 10 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c > >> index 974154a74505..b01966dc7eb3 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c > >> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c > >> @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static int cros_ec_keyb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> ckdev->dev = dev; > >> dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, ckdev); > >> > >> - idev->name = ec->ec_name; > >> + idev->name = CROS_EC_DEV_NAME; > >> idev->phys = ec->phys_name; > >> __set_bit(EV_REP, idev->evbit); > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c > >> index 08d82bfc5268..4fbb4ce8f81e 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c > >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c > >> @@ -24,11 +24,29 @@ > >> #include <linux/mfd/core.h> > >> #include <linux/mfd/cros_ec.h> > >> > >> -static const struct mfd_cell cros_devs[] = { > >> - { > >> - .name = "cros-ec-ctl", > >> - .id = PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, > >> - }, > >> +#define CROS_EC_DEV_EC_INDEX 0 > >> +#define CROS_EC_DEV_PD_INDEX 1 > >> + > >> +struct cros_ec_platform ec_p = { > >> + .cmd_offset = EC_CMD_PASSTHRU_OFFSET(CROS_EC_DEV_EC_INDEX), > >> +}; > >> + > >> +struct cros_ec_platform pd_p = { > >> + .cmd_offset = EC_CMD_PASSTHRU_OFFSET(CROS_EC_DEV_PD_INDEX), > >> +}; > >> + > >> +struct mfd_cell ec_cell = { > >> + .name = "cros-ec-ctl", > >> + .id = PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, > >> + .platform_data = &ec_p, > >> + .pdata_size = sizeof(ec_p), > >> +}; > >> + > >> +struct mfd_cell ec_pd_cell = { > >> + .name = "cros-ec-ctl", > >> + .id = PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, > >> + .platform_data = &pd_p, > >> + .pdata_size = sizeof(pd_p), > >> }; > >> > >> int cros_ec_register(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev) > >> @@ -52,14 +70,39 @@ int cros_ec_register(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev) > >> > >> cros_ec_query_all(ec_dev); > >> > >> - err = mfd_add_devices(dev, 0, cros_devs, > >> - ARRAY_SIZE(cros_devs), > >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) > >> + ec_p.ec_name = of_get_property(dev->of_node, "devname", > >> + NULL); > > > > Has this binding already been accepted? We don't normally allow > > "device name"properties in DT. > > > > Sigh, I now noticed that I missed the DT binding change when originally > forward porting the patches from the downstream ChromiumOS tree. I'm so > sorry about that. > > ChromiumOS tree has in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt: > > Optional properties (All): > - devname: name of the EC. Can be based on its function: for instance, > for Sensor Hub, 'cros_sh', for Power Delivery MCU 'cros_pd'. > If not present, 'cros_ec' can be assumed. > > When you say that normally device names are not allowed in DT, do you mean > that "devname" is a too generic property name? (which I totally agree) or > that DT bindings shouldn't have a property to change a device's name for > something more descriptive? > > Because for example, the regulator bindings has a "regulator-name" property. > If you agree I can change the property to "google,cros-ec-name" which should > be more precise. I mean, no names of devices are allowed in Device Tree: `git grep name -- arch/arm/boot/dts/ | grep dev` > >> + if (!ec_p.ec_name) > >> + ec_p.ec_name = CROS_EC_DEV_NAME; > >> + > >> + err = mfd_add_devices(ec_dev->dev, CROS_EC_DEV_EC_INDEX, &ec_cell, 1, > >> NULL, ec_dev->irq, NULL); > > > > Take a look at how 'id' (second argument) is handled in mfd-core, then > > try to figure out why what you're doing is not correct. > > > > I see, so I should not set the struct mfd_cell .id to PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO and > just pass PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO to mfd_add_devices() so platform_device_add() > automatically allocates a device ID and sets pdev->id_auto = true. > > It was only working because CROS_EC_DEV_EC_INDEX was zero so id + cell->id > was still PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO but for CROS_EC_DEV_PD_INDEX, it was set to > PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE... > > I'll change that, thanks for pointing it out. No problem -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |