Hello Anand, On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Javier, > > Ok sorry for the mistake and not following the protocol. > Now I clearly understood my mistake. It will not be repeated. > I will resend the patch. > > Is this correct format to follow. > > Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > This patch is based on Krzysztof github branch > work-next/odroid-xu3-s2mps11-irq. > v2 - Fixed the comment. > Yes, that's a correct way of doing it. One minor nit: I think your Signed-off-by tag should be before Krzysztof's Tested-by since first you posted the patch and then he tested it. > -Anand Moon > Best regards, Javier > On 29 May 2015 at 19:19, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hello Anand, >> >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Enable regulator for usbdrd3_0 and usbdrd3_1. >>> Looking at the schematic pin diagram for MAX77802 >>> USB3_0 and USB3_1 is regulated by LDO9 and LD011. >>> >>> Fix the boot message of failed. >>> [ 3.503539] exynos-dwc3 usb@12000000: Looking up vdd33-supply from device tree >>> [ 3.503556] exynos-dwc3 usb@12000000: Looking up vdd33-supply property in node /usb@12000000 failed >>> [ 3.503568] usb@12000000 supply vdd33 not found, using dummy regulator >>> [ 3.509154] exynos-dwc3 usb@12000000: Looking up vdd10-supply from device tree >>> [ 3.509170] exynos-dwc3 usb@12000000: Looking up vdd10-supply property in node /usb@12000000 failed >>> [ 3.509181] usb@12000000 supply vdd10 not found, using dummy regulator >>> [ 3.917548] exynos-dwc3 usb@12400000: Looking up vdd33-supply from device tree >>> [ 3.917565] exynos-dwc3 usb@12400000: Looking up vdd33-supply property in node /usb@12400000 failed >>> [ 3.917578] usb@12400000 supply vdd33 not found, using dummy regulator >>> [ 3.922731] exynos-dwc3 usb@12400000: Looking up vdd10-supply from device tree >>> [ 3.922747] exynos-dwc3 usb@12400000: Looking up vdd10-supply property in node /usb@12400000 failed >>> >>> --- >>> This patch is based on Krzysztof github branch work-next/odroid-xu3-s2mps11-irq. >>> v2 - Fixed the comment. >>> --- >>> >>> Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3.dts | 10 ++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >>> >> >> Your commit message is again not correct. Sorry if this is a long >> explanation but I want you to understand how the git tools work. >> >> What git am and other git tools do is to strip any text that is >> between the first "---" and the actual diff. With git format-patch the >> information that is placed there by default is the file(s) diffstat >> since that is a useful information for someone reviewing your patches >> but not so to be part of the commit message, you can get it anyways >> later with git $commitId --stat. >> >> So what people do is to add information after the first "---" that is >> relevant for reviewers but don't want to end the commit message. >> Usually this is the patch change history but it can contain any other >> information like links to previous patches, dependencies posted >> previously, etc. >> >> With your current patch, that means that git am will strip your >> Signed-off-by and Krzysztof's Tested-by tags which should be part of >> the commit message. >> >> Krzysztof already mentioned but a good exercise would be to generate >> your patch with git format-patch and then apply again with git am to >> see if the end result is what you were expecting for. >> >> Hope it helps, >> Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |