Hi,
On 20 May 2015 at 17:58, Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2015-05-20 16:33, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>> When mode's vrefresh is zero we should ask DRM core to calculate vrefresh
>> for us so we can get the correct value instead of relying on fixed value
>> defined in a macro.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c
>> index 9819fa6..08f7197 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c
>> @@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
>> * CPU Interface.
>> */
>>
>> -#define FIMD_DEFAULT_FRAMERATE 60
>> #define MIN_FB_WIDTH_FOR_16WORD_BURST 128
>>
>> /* position control register for hardware window 0, 2 ~ 4.*/
>> @@ -329,7 +328,7 @@ static bool fimd_mode_fixup(struct exynos_drm_crtc
>> *crtc,
>> struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
>> {
>> if (adjusted_mode->vrefresh == 0)
>
> Well, I'm not completly sure how this all works, but shouldn't we check
> 'mode' here, and not 'adjusted_mode'?
adjusted_mode is fine; it is pre-populated with the value from mode.
'mode' itself _must not_ be modified.
Mind you, this is missing a hunk to reject entirely invalid modes, i.e.:
if (adjusted_mode->vrefresh == 0)
adjusted_mode->vrefresh = drm_mode_vrefresh(adjusted_mode);
if (adjusted_mode->vrefresh == 0)
return false;
Cheers,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
