of_machine_is_compatible() seems to be preferred over soc_is_exynos4().
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v2:
1. New patch, requested by Kukjin Kim.
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
index c3bfbba3006d..5917a30eee33 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
*/
void exynos_set_delayed_reset_assertion(bool enable)
{
- if (soc_is_exynos4()) {
+ if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4")) {
unsigned int tmp, core_id;
for (core_id = 0; core_id < num_possible_cpus(); core_id++) {
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
