2015-05-09 3:26 GMT+09:00 Kukjin Kim <kgene@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 05/06/15 09:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Krzysztof Kozlowski (1): >> ARM: EXYNOS: Fix failed second suspend on Exynos4 >> >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 2 ++ >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 39 ++------------------------------------- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 3 +++ >> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) >> -- > > Hi Krzysztof, > > Yeah, the patch is old thing but if I remember correctly, I couldn't > apply it because of soc_is_xxx() macro. Yes, I agree with the way, > firstly fix something and if required, then update it later....But! > > Please address comments about that, if not, it will not be accepted by > arm-soc tree. Hi, Actually during previous discussion I addressed all the issues: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/18/108 but there was no response from your side. In previous thread you also asked about proper way of using the DELAYED_RESET_ASSERTION. I tried to obtain additional docs from LSI but couldn't. In current documentation it was described vaguely so I looked at vendor source code. The patch IMHO is the best solution. Additionally it was tested (Chanwoo and Bartlomiej) and fixes the issue. As for the soc_is_exynos -> of_machine_is_compatible I will prepare a follow up to fix this. Let me know if you have any other comments about it. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html