Hello, On 04/29/2015 09:45 PM, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 10:40 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> FWIW, this patch fixes the boot panics when using MMC rootfs on >> exynos5800-peach-pi with current linux-next that have been happening >> for awhile. > > That seems unlikely as this patch changes things in the exynos5250.dtsi, > which isn't used by exynos5800-peach-pi.? > Indeed, it will be surprising if $subject changes any behavior on Exynos5420/5422/5800 machines. FWIW, this patch is not needed anymore since the right fix is Krzysztof's "drm/exynos: Enable DP clock to fix display on Exynos5250 and other" patch which is already in linux-next. The regression on Exynos5420/5422/5800 that has been for a while is fixed by "ARM: dts: Make DP a consumer of DISP1 power domain on Exynos5420" [0] which has been posted many weeks ago. >> For several months now, DRM/display related stuff is very routinely >> breaking basic booting on exynos5, which gives the rather strong >> impression that the DRM stuff is not tested well enough to be merged. > > Unfortunately it seems to have been that way for ages, but only has > started being visible since Javier turned on the various exynos DRM > drivers on in exynos_defconfig.. So now we're actually seeing bugs > rather then just having broken code sit around :/ > Agreed. Best regards, Javier [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/12/153 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |