Abhilash Kesavan <kesavan.abhilash@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> [...] >> >>> Unfortunately I don't fully understand why this clock needs to be >>> enabled. It would be good if someone at Samsung can explain in more >>> detail what the real problem really is. >> >> +1 >> >> Maybe Abhilash can shed some light here? >> >> We really should know *why* this is needed because having the fix in the >> clock driver just doesn't seem right. It seems like the DMA driver >> should be managing this clock. > > I think my last mail might not have reached you (was accidentally sent > as html). Yeah, I saw it a bit later in Javier's reply. Thanks for doing the research and reporting back. > We are gating the aclk266_g2d clock without checking the > CG_STATUS0 register bits as specified in the UM. It looks like we need > to keep several clocks alive or gate them only after checking the > CG_STATUSx register bits. I dont' know much about this clock hardware, but to me it sounds like a clock driver bug. The suspend fix Javier is proposing would fix it, but to me it sounds like the clock driver needs to actually start checking these CG_STATUSx bits before gating clocks. Otherwise, we might fix this current bug but a similar one will come and bite us another day. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |