On 2015년 03월 27일 09:15, Tobias Jakobi wrote: > Inki Dae wrote: >> Hello Javier, >> >> Applied. >> >> Could you use right prefix of the subject like below when you post patch? >> >> 'drm/exynos: ...', not 'drm: Exynos: ...' >> >> Your email will be filtered from my mailbox if you don't use the right >> prefix so I couldn't check and take care of your patch. > I would suggest to change (or drop) the filter settings then. I don't Filters of my mailbox are considered for two cases, one is DRI mailing list, other is drm/exynos. So if you don't use the drm/exynos prefix, then I would try to find your patch in DRI mailing list - I sometimes check the mailing list. However, the mailing list have so much emails so it'd be not easy to pick up only exynos relevant patches among the email lists. As a result, you would get the my review lately. > think you can expect people to jump through these hoops to reach a > maintainer of a kernel subsystem. Especially since this not 'documented' > anywhere. Right, this is not documented but if you have ever checked exynos drm driver tree, then I think you could know how we use the prefix. Of course, I don't like to force the use of this prefix but if you and other people use prefix in the manner of them, exynos drm tree would be a little bit messy. i.e., DRM: EXYNOS, drm: exynos, drm: Exynos, drm/exynos, drm/exynos: fimd, drm: exynos: fimd, DRM: EXYNOS: FIMD, ... so many cases.... Do you really want this? So I will always say "please, use right prefix" Otherwise, I will change it while merging as is. And I see that other drm drivers have their own way which is not documented but just implicitly. Thanks, Inki Dae > > > > With best wishes, > Tobias > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |