Hi,
On Monday, February 23, 2015 10:07:50 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20 February 2015 at 21:50, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Allow driver build for !THERMAL or !CPU_THERMAL cases.
> >
> > The new dependency rule is the same as the one that CPUFREQ_DT
> > option has (for cpufreq-dt driver which has the same issue with
> > using of_cpufreq_cooling_register()).
> >
> > Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: 8b2b4a4e5366 ("cpufreq: exynos: allow modular build")
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> > index 1b06fc4..f4df4af3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> > @@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ config ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ
> > config ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ
> > tristate "SAMSUNG EXYNOS CPUfreq Driver"
> > depends on CPU_EXYNOS4210 || SOC_EXYNOS4212 || SOC_EXYNOS4412 || SOC_EXYNOS5250
> > - depends on THERMAL
> > + # if CPU_THERMAL is on and THERMAL=m, ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ cannot be =y:
> > + depends on !CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL
> > help
> > This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS platforms.
> > Supported SoC versions are:
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you for the ACK.
Would you pick this patch up or should I resend it to Rafael?
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
