Hi Guenter, > On 02/18/2015 02:07 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > This patch provides code for reading PWM FAN configuration data via > > device tree. The pwm-fan can work with full speed when configuration > > is not provided. However, errors are propagated when wrong DT > > bindings are found. > > Additionally the struct pwm_fan_ctx has been extended. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes for v2: > > - Rename pwm_fan_max_states to pwm_fan_cooling_levels > > - Moving pwm_fan_of_get_cooling_data() call after setting end > > enabling PWM FAN > > - pwm_fan_of_get_cooling_data() now can fail - preserving old > > behaviour > > - Remove unnecessary dev_err() call > > Changes for v3: > > - Patch's headline has been reedited > > - pwm_fan_of_get_cooling_data() return code is now being checked. > > - of_property_count_elems_of_size() is now used instead > > of_find_property() > > - More verbose patch description added > > Changes for v4: > > - dev_err() has been removed from pwm_fan_of_get_cooling_data() > > - Returning -EINVAL when "cooling-levels" are defined in DT, but > > doesn't have the value > > --- > > drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 52 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, > > 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c > > index bd42d39..82cd06a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c > > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c > > @@ -30,7 +30,10 @@ > > struct pwm_fan_ctx { > > struct mutex lock; > > struct pwm_device *pwm; > > - unsigned char pwm_value; > > + unsigned int pwm_value; > > + unsigned int pwm_fan_state; > > + unsigned int pwm_fan_max_state; > > + unsigned int *pwm_fan_cooling_levels; > > }; > > > > static int __set_pwm(struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx, unsigned long pwm) > > @@ -100,6 +103,48 @@ static struct attribute *pwm_fan_attrs[] = { > > > > ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(pwm_fan); > > > > +int pwm_fan_of_get_cooling_data(struct device *dev, struct > > pwm_fan_ctx *ctx) +{ > > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > > + int num, i, ret; > > + > > + ret = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "cooling-levels", > > + sizeof(u32)); > > + > > + if (ret == -EINVAL) > > + return 0; > > The function returns -EINVAL if there is no such property, > but also if prop->length % elem_size != 0. The latter _would_ > be an error. > > Overall I don't entirely understand why you do not call > of_find_property first. If that returns NULL, you would know for sure > that the property does not exist, and you would not have to second > guess the returned error from of_property_count_elems_of_size. For sake of readability I will at v5 first check of_find_property() and if it is correct, then I will call of_property_count_u32_elems(). > > On a side note, there is of_property_count_u32_elems() to count > properties of size u32. > > > + > > + if (ret <= 0) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Wrong data!\n"); > > + return ret ? ret : -EINVAL; > > + } > > If devicetree is not configured, of_property_count_elems_of_size > returns -ENOSYS, which is returned, causing the driver to fail > loading. Has of_property_count_elems_of_size() returns -ENOSYS? Maybe something has changed, but in my linux-vanila (3.19-rc4) at ./drivers/of/base.c it returns -EINVAL, -ENODATA or number of elements. Have I missed something? > > > + > > + num = ret; > > + ctx->pwm_fan_cooling_levels = devm_kzalloc(dev, num * > > sizeof(u32), > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!ctx->pwm_fan_cooling_levels) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "cooling-levels", > > + > > ctx->pwm_fan_cooling_levels, num); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Property 'cooling-levels' cannot be > > read!\n"); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { > > + if (ctx->pwm_fan_cooling_levels[i] > MAX_PWM) { > > + dev_err(dev, "PWM fan state[%d]:%d > > > %d\n", i, > > + ctx->pwm_fan_cooling_levels[i], > > MAX_PWM); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + ctx->pwm_fan_max_state = num - 1; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > static int pwm_fan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > struct device *hwmon; > > @@ -145,6 +190,11 @@ static int pwm_fan_probe(struct > > platform_device *pdev) pwm_disable(ctx->pwm); > > return PTR_ERR(hwmon); > > } > > + > > + ret = pwm_fan_of_get_cooling_data(&pdev->dev, ctx); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; I think that here is the confusing part. Please compare this patch with the following one. Here we configure ctx struct via DT. If of_property_count_u32_elems() returns -EINVAL, then we consider that "cooling-levels" wasn't defined in DT and return with 0. Other error codes are considered as errors and probe return error code. > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > > -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html