Hello Stephen, On 02/12/2015 08:55 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 02/12/15 05:58, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> After the clk API change to return a per-user clock instance, both the >> struct clk_core and struct clk pointers from the hw clock needs to be >> assigned to clock that share the same state. >> >> In the future the struct clk_core will be removed and this is going to > > s/clk_core/clk/? > hrmm, I thought that the plan was to eventually merge clk_core into clk_hw. In any case, if I got it backwards then I guess that the commit message could be fixed up by Mike when the patches are applied? >> change again so to avoid having to change the assignments twice in all >> the drivers, add a helper function to have an indirection level. >> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Thanks a lot for your review. Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |