On wto, 2015-02-10 at 15:21 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 2/10/2015 3:17 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > >>> Additionally (on Arndale Octa): > > >>> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary > >>> domain status slaves > >>> /device runtime status > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> power-domain on > >>> /devices/platform/amba/3880000.adma suspended > >>> power-domain off > >>> power-domain off > >>> power-domain off > >>> power-domain off > >>> power-domain off > > >>> This really is not helpful. From the power domain debugfs code it is > >>> complicated to extract of_node of power domain. > > >> You shouldn't need it. > > >>> It is easier to print > >>> the name of power domain. But wait... all names are the same! :) So > >>> why do we have the name in the first place? > > >> I'm not sure why the full platform device names aren't printed -- they > >> should all be different. > > > This debugfs code iterates over list of generic_pm_domains (gpd_list). I > > cannot find function for translating from genpd to its platform device > > so only genpd->name can be printed. > > Then why power domains aren't just named with the platform device names? Right, the mach-exynos/pm_domains.c set the name equal to OF node name. I'll send a patch extending the name. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |