2015-01-08 22:17 GMT+01:00 Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Changes since v11: >> - Rebased on top of git://linuxtv.org/snawrocki/samsung.git for-v3.19-exynos-clk >> >> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 specific cpufreq >> drivers and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver for these platforms. This >> series also enables cpufreq support for Exynos5420 using arm_big_little cpufreq >> driver. >> >> This series is based on the following branch. >> git://linuxtv.org/snawrocki/samsung.git for-v3.19-exynos-clk >> >> This series depends on the following patch which can be picked from >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git samsung/dt >> e540920cf21c (ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs). >> >> This patch series has been tested on Exynos4210/5250/5420 based boards. >> Tomasz Figa had plans to take this in the Samsung clock tree for v3.19 >> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg37933.html). >> Sylwester, could you consider to merge this in your tree? > > CPUfreq for exynos is still not upstream. What's the status of this > series? It's been ver a month since there's been any activity here > (or any responses to the issues I reported.) > > On a related note, this series only does frequency scaling. Is there > any work going on to also enable voltage scaling for the CPU rails as > well? Hi Thomas, Do you plan to continue with this work? It would be very helpful. I also wonder if Exynos 4412 could be re-added (without the boost if these bindings are not ready)? Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |