On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:48:18AM +0900, Joonyoung Shim wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 02/04/2015 11:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:49:25PM +0900, Joonyoung Shim wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 02/04/2015 04:14 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > >>> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> Add CRTC callbacks .atomic_begin() .atomic_flush(). On exynos they > >>> unprotect the windows before the commit and protects it after based on > >>> a plane mask tha store which plane will be updated. > >>> > >> > >> I don't think they need now. > > > > This does exactly what I wanted to do in my atomic poc but couldn't > > because of the massive layer hell that was still around in atomic. Haven't > > looked into the patch in details, so no full r-b but good enough for an > > > > I agree about its operation but i think it is unnecessary now. Because > it's exactly same operation with current codes. Well that's to be expected since if you don't want to have some duplicated code while transitioning to atomic you must do it all in one giant patch. With a bit of duplication you can move things over slowly, in differnt phases and piece by piece like Padovan's patch series here. The duplication should go away in the end again. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |