On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 02:16:52 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > These came out of running randconfig build tests on ARM. The three > patches are completely independent, so please apply what looks good. > > The two s3c patches are for old bugs and should go through the > cpufreq tree. > > The exynos bug only exists in the thermal-soc tree at the moment > and should get picked up by Eduardo with an Ack from the cpufreq > maintainers, or alternatively the bug should get fixed differently > if someone can come up with a better solution. > > Arnd Bergmann (3): > cpufreq: s3c: remove incorrect __init annotations > cpufreq: s3c: remove last use of resume_clocks callback > cpufreq: exynos: allow modular build > > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 14 +++++++++----- > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.h | 6 +++--- > drivers/cpufreq/exynos4210-cpufreq.c | 1 + > drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c | 1 + > drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c | 1 + > drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c | 10 +--------- > 7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) I'm assuming that this series will go in through the Samsumg tree. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html