On 28 January 2015 at 18:46, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Commit 32726d2d550 ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove legacy clock code")
> already removed the callback pointer, but there was one remaining
> user:
>
> drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c: In function 's3c_cpufreq_resume_clocks':
> drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c:149:14: error: 'struct s3c_cpufreq_info' has no member named 'resume_clocks'
> cpu_cur.info->resume_clocks();
> ^
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 32726d2d550 ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove legacy clock code")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v3.17+
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
> index bd340a1ca87d..733aa5153e74 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
> @@ -144,11 +144,6 @@ static void s3c_cpufreq_setfvco(struct s3c_cpufreq_config *cfg)
> (cfg->info->set_fvco)(cfg);
> }
>
> -static inline void s3c_cpufreq_resume_clocks(void)
> -{
> - cpu_cur.info->resume_clocks();
> -}
> -
> static inline void s3c_cpufreq_updateclk(struct clk *clk,
> unsigned int freq)
> {
> @@ -417,9 +412,6 @@ static int s3c_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> last_target = ~0; /* invalidate last_target setting */
>
> - /* first, find out what speed we resumed at. */
> - s3c_cpufreq_resume_clocks();
> -
> /* whilst we will be called later on, we try and re-set the
> * cpu frequencies as soon as possible so that we do not end
> * up resuming devices and then immediately having to re-set
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
