On 27 January 2015 at 01:05, Hyungwon Hwang <human.hwang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear Emil, > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:05:51 +0000 > Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 26 January 2015 at 01:42, Hyungwon Hwang <human.hwang@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > Dear Tobias, >> > >> > Thanks for fixing it. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Hyungwon Hwang <human.hwang@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> Hi Hyungwon Hwang >> >> I'm a bit confused about the use of s-o-b here. I've assumed that >> libdrm follows the kernel style [1] for those type of things ? >> Would you have anything handy which I can read on the topic ? > > I also think that DRI-devel mailing list follow the kernel rule. Sweet I'm not loosing my mind (much). [...] > Was it wrong to add s-o-b here? Should I have used "Reviewed-by" here? > I am sorry, if I broke the rule and confused you. > Don't think any apology is due, I was just hinting that the patch has the s-o-b already :P Where as "what I should have used" that depends on your intent and/or the action undertaken. Thanks Emil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |