Hi Marc,
On 2015-01-07 18:42, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> IMX6 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide
> wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert
> this code to use stacked domains instead.
>
> This patch does just this, updating the DT files to actually
> reflect what the HW provides.
>
> BIG FAT WARNING: because the DTs were so far lying by not
> exposing the fact that the GPC block is actually the first
> interrupt controller in the chain, kernels with this patch
> applied wont have any suspend-resume facility when booted
> with old DTs, and old kernels with updated DTs won't even boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 6 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl.dtsi | 5 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi | 5 +-
> arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6sl.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6sx.c | 1 -
> 8 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
> index 4fc03b7..c16d428 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> interrupt-controller;
> reg = <0x00a01000 0x1000>,
> <0x00a00100 0x100>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> };
>
> clocks {
> @@ -82,7 +83,7 @@
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
> compatible = "simple-bus";
> - interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpc>;
> ranges;
>
> dma_apbh: dma-apbh@00110000 {
> @@ -122,6 +123,7 @@
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-twd-timer";
> reg = <0x00a00600 0x20>;
> interrupts = <1 13 0xf01>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_TWD>;
> };
>
> @@ -694,8 +696,10 @@
> gpc: gpc@020dc000 {
> compatible = "fsl,imx6q-gpc";
> reg = <0x020dc000 0x4000>;
> + interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <3>; is missing here.
I tested the patchset on a Colibri iMX6, but the module stopped booting
at some point. No error, no warn, but it looked like IRQ's are not
working:
[ 1.623939] platform sound: Driver imx-sgtl5000 requests probe
deferral
[ 1.630677] backlight supply power not found, using dummy regulator
[ 1.637067] pwm-backlight backlight: unable to request PWM, trying
legacy API
[ 1.644271] pwm-backlight backlight: unable to request legacy PWM
[ 1.650534] platform backlight: Driver pwm-backlight requests probe
deferral
[ 1.658080] platform 2028000.ssi: Driver fsl-ssi-dai requests probe
deferral
[ 1.665441] fec 2188000.ethernet eth0: Freescale FEC PHY driver
[Micrel KSZ8041] (mii_bus:phy_addr=2188000.ethernet:00, irq=-1)
[ 1.677157] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
[freeze]
I figured out that the GPC code did not get called. After digging
through the parsing code, I found the reason: irq_find_host always opted
to intc because this was missing... So, interrupt-cells mandatory for
all interrupt-controller? Maybe we could add a warn somewhere..?
With that in place, it worked fine:
Tested-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx>
> interrupts = <0 89 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <0 90 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> };
>
> gpr: iomuxc-gpr@020e0000 {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl.dtsi
> index 36ab8e0..35099b7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl.dtsi
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
> interrupt-controller;
> reg = <0x00a01000 0x1000>,
> <0x00a00100 0x100>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> };
>
> clocks {
> @@ -95,7 +96,7 @@
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
> compatible = "simple-bus";
> - interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpc>;
> ranges;
>
> ocram: sram@00900000 {
> @@ -603,7 +604,9 @@
> gpc: gpc@020dc000 {
> compatible = "fsl,imx6sl-gpc", "fsl,imx6q-gpc";
> reg = <0x020dc000 0x4000>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> interrupts = <0 89 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> };
>
> gpr: iomuxc-gpr@020e0000 {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi
> index 7a24fee..c476e67 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi
> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@
> interrupt-controller;
> reg = <0x00a01000 0x1000>,
> <0x00a00100 0x100>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> };
>
> clocks {
> @@ -131,7 +132,7 @@
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
> compatible = "simple-bus";
> - interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpc>;
> ranges;
>
> pmu {
> @@ -700,7 +701,9 @@
> gpc: gpc@020dc000 {
> compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-gpc", "fsl,imx6q-gpc";
> reg = <0x020dc000 0x4000>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 89 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> };
>
> iomuxc: iomuxc@020e0000 {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h
> index cfcdb62..7052302 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h
> @@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ static inline void imx_scu_map_io(void) {}
> static inline void imx_smp_prepare(void) {}
> #endif
> void imx_src_init(void);
> -void imx_gpc_init(void);
> void imx_gpc_pre_suspend(bool arm_power_off);
> void imx_gpc_post_resume(void);
> void imx_gpc_mask_all(void);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> index 5f3602e..240109b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #define GPC_PGC_CPU_PDN 0x2a0
>
> #define IMR_NUM 4
> +#define GPC_MAX_IRQS (IMR_NUM * 32)
>
> static void __iomem *gpc_base;
> static u32 gpc_wake_irqs[IMR_NUM];
> @@ -56,17 +57,17 @@ void imx_gpc_post_resume(void)
>
> static int imx_gpc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
> {
> - unsigned int idx = d->hwirq / 32 - 1;
> + unsigned int idx = d->hwirq / 32;
> u32 mask;
>
> - /* Sanity check for SPI irq */
> - if (d->hwirq < 32)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> mask = 1 << d->hwirq % 32;
> gpc_wake_irqs[idx] = on ? gpc_wake_irqs[idx] | mask :
> gpc_wake_irqs[idx] & ~mask;
>
> + /*
> + * Do *not* call into the parent, as the GIC doesn't have any
> + * wake-up facility...
> + */
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -96,7 +97,7 @@ void imx_gpc_hwirq_unmask(unsigned int hwirq)
> void __iomem *reg;
> u32 val;
>
> - reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (hwirq / 32 - 1) * 4;
> + reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + hwirq / 32 * 4;
> val = readl_relaxed(reg);
> val &= ~(1 << hwirq % 32);
> writel_relaxed(val, reg);
> @@ -107,7 +108,7 @@ void imx_gpc_hwirq_mask(unsigned int hwirq)
> void __iomem *reg;
> u32 val;
>
> - reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (hwirq / 32 - 1) * 4;
> + reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + hwirq / 32 * 4;
> val = readl_relaxed(reg);
> val |= 1 << (hwirq % 32);
> writel_relaxed(val, reg);
> @@ -115,37 +116,115 @@ void imx_gpc_hwirq_mask(unsigned int hwirq)
>
> static void imx_gpc_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> - /* Sanity check for SPI irq */
> - if (d->hwirq < 32)
> - return;
> -
> imx_gpc_hwirq_unmask(d->hwirq);
> + irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
> }
>
> static void imx_gpc_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> - /* Sanity check for SPI irq */
> - if (d->hwirq < 32)
> - return;
> -
> imx_gpc_hwirq_mask(d->hwirq);
> + irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
> +}
This two function end up very small, can't we just alter
imx_gpc_hwirq_unmask to use struct irq_data directly?
Code looks fine to me:
Acked-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx>
> +
> +static struct irq_chip imx_gpc_chip = {
> + .name = "GPC",
> + .irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent,
> + .irq_mask = imx_gpc_irq_mask,
> + .irq_unmask = imx_gpc_irq_unmask,
> + .irq_retrigger = irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy,
> + .irq_set_wake = imx_gpc_irq_set_wake,
> +};
> +
> +static int imx_gpc_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *domain,
> + struct device_node *controller,
> + const u32 *intspec,
> + unsigned int intsize,
> + unsigned long *out_hwirq,
> + unsigned int *out_type)
> +{
> + if (domain->of_node != controller)
> + return -EINVAL; /* Shouldn't happen, really... */
> + if (intsize != 3)
> + return -EINVAL; /* Not GIC compliant */
> + if (intspec[0] != 0)
> + return -EINVAL; /* No PPI should point to this domain */
> +
> + *out_hwirq = intspec[1];
> + *out_type = intspec[2];
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_gpc_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
> + unsigned int virq,
> + unsigned int nr_irqs, void *data)
> +{
> + struct of_phandle_args *args = data;
> + struct of_phandle_args parent_args;
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (args->args_count != 3)
> + return -EINVAL; /* Not GIC compliant */
> + if (args->args[0] != 0)
> + return -EINVAL; /* No PPI should point to this domain */
> +
> + hwirq = args->args[1];
> + if (hwirq >= GPC_MAX_IRQS)
> + return -EINVAL; /* Can't deal with this */
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
> + irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i,
> + &imx_gpc_chip, NULL);
> +
> + parent_args = *args;
> + parent_args.np = domain->parent->of_node;
> + return irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs, &parent_args);
> }
>
> -void __init imx_gpc_init(void)
> +static struct irq_domain_ops imx_gpc_domain_ops = {
> + .xlate = imx_gpc_domain_xlate,
> + .alloc = imx_gpc_domain_alloc,
> + .free = irq_domain_free_irqs_common,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init imx_gpc_init(struct device_node *node,
> + struct device_node *parent)
> {
> - struct device_node *np;
> + struct irq_domain *parent_domain, *domain;
> int i;
>
> - np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx6q-gpc");
> - gpc_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> - WARN_ON(!gpc_base);
> + if (!parent) {
> + pr_err("%s: no parent, giving up\n", node->full_name);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + parent_domain = irq_find_host(parent);
> + if (!parent_domain) {
> + pr_err("%s: unable to obtain parent domain\n", node->full_name);
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> +
> + gpc_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
> + if (WARN_ON(!gpc_base))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + domain = irq_domain_add_hierarchy(parent_domain, 0, GPC_MAX_IRQS,
> + node, &imx_gpc_domain_ops,
> + NULL);
> + if (!domain) {
> + iounmap(gpc_base);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> /* Initially mask all interrupts */
> for (i = 0; i < IMR_NUM; i++)
> writel_relaxed(~0, gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + i * 4);
>
> - /* Register GPC as the secondary interrupt controller behind GIC */
> - gic_arch_extn.irq_mask = imx_gpc_irq_mask;
> - gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask = imx_gpc_irq_unmask;
> - gic_arch_extn.irq_set_wake = imx_gpc_irq_set_wake;
> + return 0;
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * We cannot use the IRQCHIP_DECLARE macro that lives in
> + * drivers/irqchip, so we're forced to roll our own. Not very nice.
> + */
> +OF_DECLARE_2(irqchip, imx_gpc, "fsl,imx6q-gpc", imx_gpc_init);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
> index 5057d61..bbe6ff8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
> @@ -390,7 +390,6 @@ static void __init imx6q_init_irq(void)
> imx_init_revision_from_anatop();
> imx_init_l2cache();
> imx_src_init();
> - imx_gpc_init();
> irqchip_init();
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6sl.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6sl.c
> index 24bfaaf..d39c274 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6sl.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6sl.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ static void __init imx6sl_init_irq(void)
> imx_init_revision_from_anatop();
> imx_init_l2cache();
> imx_src_init();
> - imx_gpc_init();
> irqchip_init();
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6sx.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6sx.c
> index 7a96c65..72fa22d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6sx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6sx.c
> @@ -84,7 +84,6 @@ static void __init imx6sx_init_irq(void)
> imx_init_revision_from_anatop();
> imx_init_l2cache();
> imx_src_init();
> - imx_gpc_init();
> irqchip_init();
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
