Hi Lukasz, On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Abhilash, > >> Hi Lukasz and Eduardo, >> >> [...] >> > >> > Although, this shouldn't be a problem. >> > >> >> That is why we had the cycle with cpufreq folks, remember? >> >> >> >> (I will have a look in your patches) >> > >> > It would be great if those patches could find their way to therma >> > -next. Then also Abhilash could benefit from them. >> >> I have a couple of 5420/5800 based chromebooks that I will test this >> series on. Is it OK for me to start basing my Exynos7 TMU support on >> this series ? Please let me know if I can help in any other way with >> this. > > I'm fine if you rebase on top of my patches. > > However, it is up to Eduardo when he decides to pull them to -next > branch. > > I hope that it will happen soon. I tested a Peach Pit (5420 based chromebook) with your patches and they work well (temperatures and software tripping). However, my earlier comments with regards to duplicate exynos_tmu_initialize() and the thermal zone showing as disabled in sysfs . Also, I think the documentation for the dt properties are missing ? I will post my exynos7 work based on your patches soon. Please take a look. Regards, Abhilash > >> >> Regards, >> Abhilash > > > > -- > Best regards, > > Lukasz Majewski > > Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |