On 18/12/14 15:48, nick wrote: > Lucas, > That's fair do you known of anyone who does have the hardware so we can test my patch. If you do then we can get this fixed rather > easily. > Cheers Nick > > On 2014-12-18 08:39 AM, Lucas Stach wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, den 18.12.2014, 08:35 -0500 schrieb nick: >>> Krzysztof, >>> If we look at the code for this function, it already is handling the data correctly. In addition the locks >>> seem to be better protection then msleep. Further more is no reason for this delay as we are neither resetting >>> the hardware or waiting for the hardware here so why is it needed? I don't have Exynos based hardware lying >>> around through to test it. >> >> If you can't test it, don't touch it. It's that simple. There seems to be multiple msleep(20)s in exynos_mipi_dsi_common.c, a few with /* FIXME */ and a few without any comments. Looks like bad (but relatively harmless) code to me, but as Lucas said, if you can't test it, don't touch it. Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
