Hi,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 08:49:51AM +0000, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch adds new Exynos5433 dtsi to support 64-bit Exynos5433 SoC based on
> Octal core CPUs (quad Cortex-A57 and quad Cortex-A53). And Exynos5433 supports
> PSCI (Power State Coordination Interface) v0.1.
>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Geunsik Lim <geunsik.lim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-pinctrl.dtsi | 698 +++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 515 +++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 1213 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-pinctrl.dtsi
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
[...]
> + cpus {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + cpu0: cpu@100 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + reg = <0x100>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu1: cpu@101 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + reg = <0x101>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu2: cpu@102 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + reg = <0x0 0x102>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu3: cpu@103 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + reg = <0x103>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu4: cpu@0 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a57", "arm,armv8";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + reg = <0x0>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu5: cpu@1 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a57", "arm,armv8";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + reg = <0x1>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu6: cpu@2 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a57", "arm,armv8";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + reg = <0x2>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu7: cpu@3 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a57", "arm,armv8";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + reg = <0x3>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + psci {
> + compatible = "arm,psci";
> + method = "smc";
> + cpu_off = <0x84000002>;
> + cpu_on = <0xC4000003>;
> + };
Given your comments on the latest posting, has CPU_OFF been tested, and
does it work for _all_ CPUs (including CPU0)?
> +
> + soc: soc {
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges;
Is that valid when changing the number of cells? The address spaces
aren't strictly identical in that case, and I'd expect a translation
something like:
ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xff000000>;
Where the final cell is a sufficiently large value to cover all
addresses in the soc node.
[...]
> + gic:interrupt-controller@11001000 {
> + compatible = "arm,gic-400";
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + reg = <0x11001000 0x1000>,
> + <0x11002000 0x1000>,
> + <0x11004000 0x2000>,
> + <0x11006000 0x2000>;
> + interrupts = <1 9 0xf04>;
> + };
The GICC needs to be 0x2000 long to map the GICC_DIR, which is at
0x1000-0x1003.
[...]
> + pinctrl_alive: pinctrl@10580000 {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-pinctrl";
> + reg = <0x10580000 0x1000>;
> +
> + wakeup-interrupt-controller {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos7-wakeup-eint";
> + interrupts = <0 16 0>;
> + };
> + };
How exactly does the wakeup interrupt controller interact with the GIC?
Surely the relationship between the two should be described?
Is it a subcomponent of the pincontrol block?
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
