Dear Mark, On 11/27/2014 08:18 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:35:13AM +0000, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> This patch adds new Exynos5433 dtsi to support 64-bit Exynos5433 SoC >> based on Octal core CPUs (quad Cortex-A57 and quad Cortex-A53). >> >> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Geunsik Lim <geunsik.lim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-pinctrl.dtsi | 698 +++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 523 +++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 1221 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-pinctrl.dtsi >> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi > > [...] > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..3d8b576 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi >> @@ -0,0 +1,523 @@ >> +/* >> + * Samsung's Exynos5433 SoC device tree source >> + * >> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. >> + * http://www.samsung.com >> + * >> + * Samsung's Exynos5433 SoC device nodes are listed in this file. Exynos5433 >> + * based board files can include this file and provide values for board specfic >> + * bindings. >> + * >> + * Note: This file does not include device nodes for all the controllers in >> + * Exynos5433 SoC. As device tree coverage for Exynos5433 increases, additional >> + * nodes can be added to this file. >> + * >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as >> + * published by the Free Software Foundation. >> + */ >> + >> +#include "skeleton.dtsi" >> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/exynos5433.h> >> + > > Just to check: no memory reservations required for any reason? > > There also don't appear to be any memory nodes. Typically if that's > filled in by the bootloader/FW we'd have an empty node (or one with a > zero size entry) and a comment regarding the FW. I add the memory node to board dtsi file because memory information is more dependent on on h/w target than SoC. > >> +/ { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5433"; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <1>; > > Not two, on both counts? The CPUs can address more than 32 bits. You're right. I'll fix it as two and then retry to test it. > > Is there nothing in the physical address space above 0xffffffff? > > [...] > >> + cpus { >> + #address-cells = <2>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + >> + cpu0: cpu@100 { >> + device_type = "cpu"; >> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8"; >> + enable-method = "psci"; > > While the CPU nodes have enable-methods, I didn't spot a PSCI node > anywhere, so this dts cannot possibly have been used to bring up an SMP > system. > > How has this dts been tested? > > What PSCI revision have you implemented? Have have you tested it? My mistake, Exynos5433 supports PSCI v0.1. I'll add following PSCI nodes: I tested the boot of secondary cpu. psci { compatible = "arm,psci"; method = "smc"; cpu_off = <0x84000002>; cpu_on = <0xC4000003>; }; > > I take it from the presence of GICH/GICV in the gic node that CPUs enter > the kernel at EL2? > >> + reg = <0x0 0x100>; >> + clock-frequency = <1050000000>; > > What uses this? It is un-used. I'll drop it. > >> + }; > > [...] > >> + soc: soc { >> + compatible = "simple-bus"; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <1>; >> + ranges; >> + >> + fixed-rate-clocks { >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + >> + xusbxti: clock@0 { >> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; >> + clock-output-names = "xusbxti"; >> + #clock-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + }; > > Get rid of the fixed-rate-clocks container node. It's pointless and > messy. Given you only have one there's no need for the bogus > unit-address either. OK, I'll remove unneeded code and will add following dt node for fin_pll. fin_pll: xxti { compatible = "fixed-clock"; clock-output-names = "fin_pll"; #clock-cells = <0>; }; > >> + >> + cmu_top: clock-controller@0x10030000{ > > s/@0x/@/ -- a unit-address should not have the leading '0x'. Please > apply that to the rest of the file. I'll remove '0x'. > >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-cmu-top"; >> + reg = <0x10030000 0x0c04>; >> + #clock-cells = <1>; >> + }; > > [...] > >> + mct@101c0000 { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-mct"; >> + reg = <0x101c0000 0x800>; >> + interrupts = <0 102 0>, <0 103 0>, <0 104 0>, <0 105 0>, >> + <0 106 0>, <0 107 0>, <0 108 0>, <0 109>, >> + <0 110 0>, <0 111 0>, <0 112 0>, <0 113 0>; >> + clocks = <&cmu_top CLK_FIN_PLL>, <&cmu_peris CLK_PCLK_MCT>; >> + clock-names = "fin_pll", "mct"; >> + }; > > Hase this block had no changes whatsoever since its use in Exynos4210? > Do we not need a "samsung,exynos5433-mct" comaptible string too? The type of Exynos5433's MCT(Multi-Core Timer) IP is the same with the type of Exynos4210 MCT. Just Exynos5433 have eight local timer for Octa cores. CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4 CPU5 CPU6 CPU7 134: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GIC 134 mct_comp_irq 138: 3189 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GIC 138 mct_tick0 139: 0 2670 0 0 0 0 0 0 GIC 139 mct_tick1 140: 0 0 2763 0 0 0 0 0 GIC 140 mct_tick2 141: 0 0 0 2732 0 0 0 0 GIC 141 mct_tick3 142: 0 0 0 0 2998 0 0 0 GIC 142 mct_tick4 143: 0 0 0 0 0 2664 0 0 GIC 143 mct_tick5 144: 0 0 0 0 0 0 2485 0 GIC 144 mct_tick6 145: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2681 GIC 145 mct_tick7 But, existing exynos-mct.c driver(drivers/clocksource/exynos-mct.c) used 'register_current_timer_delay()' function which is supported on arm 32bit. I fix it as following diff and then I'll send it to support 64-bit Exynos SoC on exynos-mct.c. drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 1 - drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig index 9042060..27ef3fa 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig @@ -134,7 +134,6 @@ config CLKSRC_METAG_GENERIC config CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT def_bool y if ARCH_EXYNOS - depends on !ARM64 help Support for Multi Core Timer controller on Exynos SoCs. diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c index 9403061..d9c7dbb 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ static u64 notrace exynos4_read_sched_clock(void) return exynos4_read_count_32(); } +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARM64) static struct delay_timer exynos4_delay_timer; static cycles_t exynos4_read_current_timer(void) @@ -231,14 +232,17 @@ static cycles_t exynos4_read_current_timer(void) "cycles_t needs to move to 32-bit for ARM64 usage"); return exynos4_read_count_32(); } +#endif static void __init exynos4_clocksource_init(void) { exynos4_mct_frc_start(); +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARM64) exynos4_delay_timer.read_current_timer = &exynos4_read_current_timer; exynos4_delay_timer.freq = clk_rate; register_current_timer_delay(&exynos4_delay_timer); +#endif > >> + >> + gic:interrupt-controller@11001000 { >> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a15-gic"; > > Given this is multi-cluster, surely this is an external GIC-400, for > which we have a supported compatible string? > > So this should at least be: > > compatible = "arm,gic-400", "arm,cortex-a15-gic"; Exynos5433 used GIC-400. I'll modify it as following: compatible = "arm,gic-400"; > >> + #interrupt-cells = <3>; >> + interrupt-controller; >> + reg = <0x11001000 0x1000>, >> + <0x11002000 0x1000>, >> + <0x11004000 0x2000>, >> + <0x11006000 0x2000>; > > As far as I am aware, the GICC size is 8KiB. Regardless of whether we > currently use the second page of registers, they should be described. The GICC (CPU Interface Register) register of Exynos5433 is range of 0x1100_2000 ~ 0x1100_2100. But, I'll modify GICC size from 4KiB to 8KiB as following according to your comment: <0x11002000 0x1000> -> <0x11002000 0x2000> > >> + interrupts = <1 9 0xf04>; >> + }; >> + >> + serial_0: serial@14C10000 { > > Nit: Please be consistent with capitalisation of hex. IMO it's better > to leave it all lower-case. I'll use the lower-case for all base address. > > [...] > >> + timer { >> + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; >> + interrupts = <1 13 0xff01>, >> + <1 14 0xff01>, >> + <1 11 0xff01>, >> + <1 10 0xff01>; >> + clock-frequency = <24000000>; >> + use-clocksource-only; >> + use-physical-timer; > > As Marc said, NAK for these last three properties. > > There is no excuse for not setting CNTFRQ_EL0, especially given a PSCI > implementation. The last two properties have never been supported in > mainline, and shouldn't be necessary regardless. OK, I'll remove last three properties. Thanks for your review sincerely. Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |