On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:09:25AM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/soc/Makefile b/drivers/soc/Makefile > index 063113d..44d220d 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/soc/Makefile > @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += qcom/ > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA) += tegra/ > obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_TI) += ti/ > obj-$(CONFIG_PLAT_VERSATILE) += versatile/ > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += samsung/ Is ARCH_EXYNOS appropriate here, or is your new SOC_SAMSUNG better? > diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..a424ebc > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ > +# > +# SAMSUNG SOC drivers > +# > +menuconfig SOC_SAMSUNG > + bool "Samsung SOC drivers support" If you intend to select SOC_SAMSUNG, is there any point in making this a user-visible symbol? -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |