Hi Mark Brown,
The codec driver is present in mainline as rt5631.c., Its realtek's
alc5631 so retained that name.
Similarly machine driver also is named as arndale_rt5631.c but inside that
driver I have used alc5631 naming as the
audio daughter card on arndale board mentions alc5631 so I have used this
convention here so that user should not
feel the absence of the driver.
Is that ok or do you want to have one naming all over?
-Krishna
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Mark Brown" <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 7:07 PM
To: "Krishna Mohan Dani" <krishna.md@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: ALC5631: Add device tree binding
documentation
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 01:31:56PM +0530, Krishna Mohan Dani wrote:
Document the device tree binding for the ALC5631 codec and update vendor
specific prefix for the Realtek.
This driver isn't in mainline, you need to submit the driver.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
