Hi Eduardo,
>
> Hello Lukasz,
>
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:05:51AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Eduardo,
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 06:38:39PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > > This patch extends the of-thermal.c to provide information about
> > > > number of available non critical (i.e. non HW) trip points in
> > > > the system.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h | 5 +++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
> > > > b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c index 23c8d6c..cd74e64 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
> > > > @@ -128,6 +128,18 @@ int of_thermal_is_trip_en(struct
> > > > thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip) return 1;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +int of_thermal_get_non_crit_ntrips(struct thermal_zone_device
> > > > *tz) +{
> > > > + struct __thermal_zone *data = tz->devdata;
> > > > + int i;
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < data->ntrips; i++)
> > > > + if (data->trips[i].type !=
> > > > THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL)
> > > > + continue;
> > > > +
> > > > + return --i;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I am not against this addition. But looks like we start to spread
> > > some specific APIs that may not be used to other drivers.
> >
> > Why do you think that this is a specific API? In the thermal OF we
> > can define trip point as "active", "passive", "hot" and "critical".
> >
> > With the first three we can handle them and properly react. For the
> > last one SoC's PMU will power down the board.
> >
> > Do you know if any board (e.g. from TI) is NOT supposed to shut down
> > when "critical" temperature is passed?
> >
>
> So, my point is not really about the usage of trip points. It is just
> that the of-thermal API will grow with in a wide way with specific
> functions to check some property on the trip point array. And not all
> drivers may be using these function, e.g. the above proposal.
>
> > The real problem here is the accessibility to __thermal_trip and
> > __thermal_bind arrays.
> >
> > Use case:
> > In the Exynos driver we do need to initialize TMU registers with
> > threshold temperatures.
> > The temperature is read via tz->ops->get_trip_temp() [1] (from
> > of-thermal.c).
> > Unfortunately, the current API is not exporting the number of
> > non-critical trip points to know how many times call [1].
> > Of course we could by hand instantiate [1] n times, but this looks
> > for me a bit clumsy.
>
>
> I understand your use case. My point was simply that this use case may
> be specific to your driver (or few drivers).
> >
> > Additionally, we now have implicit assumption about the order of
> > defined temperatures for trip points, but I think this is not a big
> > issue.
> >
> > > Maybe having a
> > > single API to provide a read-only copy the list / array of trips
> > > might be a better approach. I will think of a better way.
> >
> > Definitely. Exporting available trip points is crucial.
> >
>
> Yeah, I think it is the best thing to do. Share a read-only array /
> copy of the needed data, and then drivers would check what ever
> property they need from the array. Just make sure you document that
> this is a read-only array (i.e. any possible change they do, won't
> affect the original array).
I agree on that.
>
> > >
> > > I also request you to document it accordingly.
> >
> > Ok, I will do that.
>
> Cool!
>
>
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > static int of_thermal_get_trend(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> > > > int trip, enum thermal_trend *trend)
> > > > {
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h
> > > > b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h index ed8ff05..334a7be 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h
> > > > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ int of_parse_thermal_zones(void);
> > > > void of_thermal_destroy_zones(void);
> > > > int of_thermal_get_ntrips(struct thermal_zone_device *);
> > > > int of_thermal_is_trip_en(struct thermal_zone_device *, int);
> > > > +int of_thermal_get_non_crit_ntrips(struct thermal_zone_device
> > > > *); #else
> > > > static inline int of_parse_thermal_zones(void) { return 0; }
> > > > static inline void of_thermal_destroy_zones(void) { }
> > > > @@ -94,6 +95,10 @@ int of_thermal_is_trip_en(struct
> > > > thermal_zone_device *, int) {
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > +int of_thermal_get_non_crit_ntrips(struct thermal_zone_device
> > > > *)
> > > here, it is supposed to be static inline.
> > >
> > > > +{
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> > > > #endif /* __THERMAL_CORE_H__ */
> > > > --
> > > > 2.0.0.rc2
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Lukasz Majewski
> >
> > Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
