On 28 October 2014 21:31, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Ulf, Rafael, > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Typically an ->attach_dev() callback would fetch some PM resourses. >> >> Those operations, like for example clk_get() may fail with different >> errors, including -EPROBE_DEFER. Instead of ignoring these errors and >> potentially only print an error message, let's propagate them to give >> callers the option to handle them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Given that several patch series using ->attach_dev() are already floating > around and will be in -next soon, what is the plan of getting this in? > Doing it ASAP (in v3.18-rc3)? > Delaying this to v3.19-rc2, which will require an atomic fixing of its users? > Any other option? I would prefer if we consider 3.18-rc[x|. That's applies also to the below patchset, which actually fixes an issue. It would simplify the process of handling other SOC specific patches which adds PM domain support. [PATCH v3 0/9] PM / Domains: Fix race conditions during boot Obviously the patches needs to be reviewed, I guess we are still in the process of doing that. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |