On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 09:50:57PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 10/20/2014 07:36 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: > > I guess I was just trying to follow the suggestion that was in the > > regulator code: > > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/regulator/core.c#L3699 > > that says "This will usually be called by machine suspend code prior > > to supending." > I see, but still I feel as if it may be a lot of duplication since most > platforms will likely want to call the regulator core suspend prepare Note that architectures are an example of a platform. It really depends what's responsible for final poweroff, we want this called as late as we possibly can. > and finish functions. Maybe it can be added as a Kconfig option so each > platform can choose at the config level if they want those to be called? No, that's obviously not going to do anything useful for multiplatform.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
