On 10/10/2014 01:38 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Since both SoCs have the same TMU IP block embedded on them, it is
> not necessary to maintain separate compatible entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index f1e8c9b..7818e2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -744,9 +744,6 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_tmu_irq(int irq, void *id)
>
> static const struct of_device_id exynos_tmu_match[] = {
> {
> - .compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-tmu",
> - },
> - {
If you want to remove compatible string for Exynos3250,
you have to modify it on exynos3250.dtsi.
Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
