Re: [PATCH 2/2] arch: arm: samsung: Clean-up usage of CONFIG_SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS symbol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Arnd,

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 September 2014 20:04:55 Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/irq-pm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/irq-pm.c
>> @@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ static struct irq_grp_save {
>>         u32     mask;
>>  } eint_grp_save[5];
>>
>> -#ifndef CONFIG_SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS
>> -#define SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS 0
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_SERIAL_SAMSUNG
>> +#define SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS   0
>>  #else
>> -#define        SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS CONFIG_SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS
>> +#define SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS   4
>>  #endif
>>
>>  static u32 irq_uart_mask[SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS];
>
> I think this won't work because now you access invalid registers
> on machines that have only three uarts.

The 6400 and 6410 SoCs both have 4 uarts. Prior to this patch
CONFIG_SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS would have been 4 for 64xx.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/init.c b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/init.c
>> index 11fbbc2..03cafe9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/init.c
>> @@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ void __init s3c24xx_init_clocks(int xtal)
>>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SAMSUNG_ATAGS)
>>  static int nr_uarts __initdata = 0;
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS
>> -static struct s3c2410_uartcfg uart_cfgs[CONFIG_SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS];
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_SAMSUNG
>> +static struct s3c2410_uartcfg uart_cfgs[4];
>>  #endif
>>
>>  /* s3c24xx_init_uartdevs
>> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ void __init s3c24xx_init_uartdevs(char *name,
>>                                   struct s3c24xx_uart_resources *res,
>>                                   struct s3c2410_uartcfg *cfg, int no)
>>  {
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_SAMSUNG
>>         struct platform_device *platdev;
>>         struct s3c2410_uartcfg *cfgptr = uart_cfgs;
>>         struct s3c24xx_uart_resources *resp;
>
> Since you hardcode the number here now, you can actually drop this #ifdef.

Will remove it.

Regards,
Abhilash
>
>         Arnd
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux