Hi Tomasz,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Abhilash,
>
> Just two minor issues inline. I leave them up to Linus to decide.
>
> Linus, if you don't mind them, feel free to apply this patch with my Ack.
>
> On 29.09.2014 07:15, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
>> Exynos7 uses different offsets for wakeup interrupt configuration registers.
>> So a new irq_chip instance for Exynos7 wakeup interrupts is added. The irq_chip
>> selection is now based on the wakeup interrupt controller compatible string.
>
> [snip]
>
>> @@ -469,12 +488,18 @@ static int exynos_eint_wkup_init(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d)
>> struct samsung_pin_bank *bank;
>> struct exynos_weint_data *weint_data;
>> struct exynos_muxed_weint_data *muxed_data;
>> + struct exynos_irq_chip *exynos_wkup_irq_chip;
>
> Quite an awful name for a local variable. "irq_chip" alone would be enough.
>
>> unsigned int muxed_banks = 0;
>> unsigned int i;
>> int idx, irq;
>>
>> for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, np) {
>> - if (of_match_node(exynos_wkup_irq_ids, np)) {
>> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>> +
>> + match = of_match_node(exynos_wkup_irq_ids, np);
>> + if (match) {
>> + exynos_wkup_irq_chip = kmemdup(match->data,
>> + sizeof(struct exynos_irq_chip), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> sizeof(*exynos_wkup_irq_chip) (or irq_chip considering my comment above)
> could be used instead.
Thanks for the acks. Will post a new version with these nits fixed.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
