Hello Lee, On 09/19/2014 02:15 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >> >> As explained above, DT, non-DT and x86 platforms instantiate the cros-ec-dev >> cells but DT platforms can define other child nodes. But I can remove the >> conditional if you want and reintroduce it once cros-ec-dev support is added. > > Yes, that makes sense. I only care about doing what's right for > Mainline, so if it doesn't make sense here, then we shouldn't be doing > it. > Understood, that's why I dropped this since as explained earlier, it makes more sense to include this change once the cros_ec_dev driver is pushed to upstream. The last version of the series (v4) I posted a week ago [0], does not include this patch so I hope the series can be picked for 3.18 since most of the patches were already acked by you. Thanks a lot and best regards, Javier [0]: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg36770.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |