On 09/25/2014 11:36 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:02:05AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/25/2014 10:17 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
[CC'ed Daniel to make him aware this patch goes through your tree]
Thanks for the head up. I was about to send the PR to Rafael.
[ ... ]
That's great, now my Exynos CPUidle DT patch should be rebased on top
of this patch so that thanks to the testing carried out by Bart it can be
merged too.
Ok, I am getting confused. How can I rebase the latest patch of your
series with a patch no yet available in my tree ?
I just wanted to say that the Exynos CPUidle DT patch depends on this
patch, that is now going through Samsung tree, to make sure we are on
the same page and prevent issues, it was not clear, sorry.
Ah, ok.
I propose just to drop the last patch and wait for the next merge to
reintegrate it into the cpuidle tree. Does it make sense ?
I agree, drop the Exynos CPUidle DT patch, we will reintegrate it in the
CPUidle tree when the merge window closes and dependencies are sorted out.
Perfect. I sent the PR to Rafael.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
