Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Hi, > Hi, > On Tuesday, August 19, 2014 01:26:49 PM Vikas Sajjan wrote: > > Hi Kukjin, > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Refactoring the pm.c to avoid using "soc_is_exynos" checks, > > > instead use the DT based lookup. > > > > > > While at it, consolidate the common code across SoCs > > > and create static helper functions. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Can you pick this series... > > I think that my PM_SLEEP=n build fixes should go in before this cleanup > series: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg35430.html > Bart, your patch has a problem due to dependency, Firmware-assisted suspend/ resume patch from Tomasz as I emailed today morning in my time. So I will apply this series firstly. Please respin the fixes once the build breakage resolved. If you have any idea, please let me know. Thanks, Kukjin > Best regards, > -- > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Samsung R&D Institute Poland > Samsung Electronics > > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h | 1 + > > > 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |