Re: [PATCH V7 11/12] Documentation: bridge: Add documentation for ps8622 DT properties

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Thierry,

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:20:40AM +0530, Ajay kumar wrote:
>> Hi Tomi,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On 17/09/14 17:29, Ajay kumar wrote:
>> >> Hi Tomi,
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for your comments.
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> On 27/08/14 17:39, Ajay Kumar wrote:
>> >>>> Add documentation for DT properties supported by ps8622/ps8625
>> >>>> eDP-LVDS converter.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>>> ---
>> >>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/video/bridge/ps8622.txt    |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>> >>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/bridge/ps8622.txt
>> >>>>
>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/bridge/ps8622.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/bridge/ps8622.txt
>> >>>> new file mode 100644
>> >>>> index 0000000..0ec8172
>> >>>> --- /dev/null
>> >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/bridge/ps8622.txt
>> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
>> >>>> +ps8622-bridge bindings
>> >>>> +
>> >>>> +Required properties:
>> >>>> +     - compatible: "parade,ps8622" or "parade,ps8625"
>> >>>> +     - reg: first i2c address of the bridge
>> >>>> +     - sleep-gpios: OF device-tree gpio specification for PD_ pin.
>> >>>> +     - reset-gpios: OF device-tree gpio specification for RST_ pin.
>> >>>> +
>> >>>> +Optional properties:
>> >>>> +     - lane-count: number of DP lanes to use
>> >>>> +     - use-external-pwm: backlight will be controlled by an external PWM
>> >>>
>> >>> What does this mean? That the backlight support from ps8625 is not used?
>> >>> If so, maybe "disable-pwm" or something?
>> >> "use-external-pwm" or "disable-bridge-pwm" would be better.
>> >
>> > Well, the properties are about the bridge. "use-external-pwm" means that
>> > the bridge uses an external PWM, which, if I understood correctly, is
>> > not what the property is about.
>> >
>> > "disable-bridge-pwm" is ok, but the "bridge" there is extra. The
>> > properties are about the bridge, so it's implicit.
>> Ok. I will use "disable-pwm".
>
> Why is this even necessary? According to the datasheet this device has
> circuitry for backlight control. If so, I'd expect it to expose either a
> backlight device or a PWM device. That way unless somebody is using the
> backlight/PWM exposed by the bridge the bridge can simply disable PWM.
The driver does expose a backlight device.
And, the decision(whether to expose a backlight device or not) is made
based on the DT flag "use-external-pwm".
This was discussed before, and you suggested to use the boolean
property, refer to this link:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2014-July/065048.html

Ajay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux