On 15.09.2014 11:03, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c >> index 554b350..71bcfbd 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c >> @@ -102,7 +102,9 @@ static int exynos_suspend(void) >> writel(EXYNOS_SLEEP_MAGIC, sysram_ns_base_addr + EXYNOS_BOOT_FLAG); >> writel(virt_to_phys(exynos_cpu_resume_ns), >> sysram_ns_base_addr + EXYNOS_BOOT_ADDR); >> - >> +#ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0 >> + l2x0_regs_phys = virt_to_phys(&l2x0_saved_regs); >> +#endif > > NAK. Please look at how arch/arm/mm/l2c-l2x0-resume.S gets the address > of this structure in assembly code. The name of this variable is crap > in any case. It's not the registers, it's the saved registers. So even > more reason to kill this abomination, which incidentally, I've already > killed off once before in the exynos code. > Right. The way l2c-l2x0-resume.S does this is much better. Somehow I overlooked it when implementing this. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |