Hi, On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Now with regulators this is pretty straightforward, but with clocks I > believe it's an open issue. AFAIR we've discussed this on MLs some time > ago (at least I remember Doug commenting on that topic) and kind of > concluded that SoC clock drivers could include lists of clocks to be > enabled at boot-up (as a HACK to enable things like simplefb until > proper support for respective features are added). I think my old problem was with earlyprintk and a core clock getting disabled. See (44ff025 clk: exynos5420: Remove aclk66_peric from the clock tree description). I think I've seen others solve the same problem with the concept of "critical clocks". I agree that regulator and clock frameworks allow very different "hacks". ;) -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |