Hello Tomasz, On 09/07/2014 06:19 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 07.09.2014 18:12, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Clocks is not an issue at least on this machine since the bootloader already >> passes the clk_ignore_unused parameter to the kernel command line so in that >> sense there isn't a regression comparing with older kernels. If possible I >> would prefer to leave this way instead of adding quirks to the clock driver, >> specially since there are proposed patches to have the display working using >> the Exynos DRM driver on this machine. > > Well, clk_ignore_unused seems a bit too coarse grained to me. Also > forcing the user to add it in his bootloader (or any other way) is not > really the best practice IMHO. > Fair enough. > At least for next 3.17-rc I'd suggest fixing this up in respective clock > driver and dropping the hack only after Exynos DRM patches are merged > and confirmed working. > Ok, I'll prepare a patch to add the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag to the needed clocks in drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c. That will be a more fine-grained solution since the clk_ignore_unused kernel parameter won't be needed. > Best regards, > Tomasz > Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |