On Monday 01 September 2014 17:04:26 Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Sep 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Maybe I'm misreading the patch, but I don't see how it creates a
> > migration path. What I want to end up with is infrastructure that
> > lets anybody call syscon_regmap_lookup_by_pdevname or
> > syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible (if they really need to)
> > without needing the platform_driver for syscon. That should not
> > require any form of compatibility layer because to the driver
> > using it there is no API change.
>
> Somehow I think the likelyhood is that I am misreading the patch.
>
> I thought that before this patch drivers we had to register a syscon
> device to bind to this driver, which was fine for the first use-cases
> of syscon as it wasn't required too early during boot. However, now
> there are use-cases where systems require access to syscon registers
> eariler in boot we require a means to obtain access prior to device
> probing. I thought this patch not only provides that possibilty, but
> also leaves in the ability to register direct from DT.
Right, it does provide the ability to have syscon before devices
are registered, I missed that part.
> > In contrast, this patch introduces a new of_syscon_{un,}register()
> > interface that would get removed after the the above has
> > been implemented, causing extra churn for any driver that also
> > wants to provide a regmap-like interface.
>
> When will we ever not have to register syscon?
The idea is that we implicitly register the syscon block when someone
calls syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible or syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle
and then return a reference to that new syscon. When another driver
looks up the same device node, we just pass a reference to the existing
syscon.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
