On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Right, there's two things going on here. One is that as you describe we > shouldn't be putting constraints in .dtsi files if we don't know they're > OK for a given board. The other thing is that on this particular board > it turns out that there's no support for varying the voltages at all so > it doesn't make sense to have to specify a range, there's only one value > anyway so the software really should be able to figure out that fixed > value all by itself. If constraints are truly irrelevant when the voltage supplied to consumers is fixed, why doesn't regulator_list_voltage honor this exemption and skip the voltage filtering that uses (potentially unspecified) constraints when output is entirely determined by a parent (or grandparent) supply that can't change its voltage? It seems odd to make callers be the ones to handle this subtlety. Thanks, Tim Kryger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |