On 07/22/2014 02:10 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:44:07PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> On 07/14/2014 01:35 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >> Mark, Mike and Alessandro, > >> This is a gentle reminder to look at the patches that touches your subsystems >> and provide acks if possible so Lee can merge the remainder set through the mfd >> tree. > > Please stop nagging, you are chasing after only one week which is > excessive for something that isn't an urgent bugfix (especially > with a series like this that has had many rapid repins). Several weeks > to a month would be more appropriate, and then resending the patches > rather than sending contentless pings is more useful. Sending mails > like this just means that people have more mail to read that isn't your > patch, it is more likely to get you negative attention than positive - > for example, I will tend to deprioritise things where I'm being chased > too urgently as I do not wish to encourage such behaviour by being seen > to reward it. > I didn't mean to bother you. It's true that it has been only a week since I posted v8 of this series but I didn't have feedback for the clock, rtc and regulator drivers since v5 which was posted on June, 26 so I thought that a ping just to be sure it was not forgotten was not that bad. But sorry I won't do it again and will just wait. About the many re-spins, as most mfd drivers this PMIC support touches different subsystems and the series had many patches so each time I had feedback for some patches I prepared a new version and reposted the whole series. This doesn't mean that all the patches changed from version to version though, some patches have not changed for several revisions. > In general I would recommend taking a step back, slowing down, and if > you are not getting a response either thinking of something else to do > in parallel or trying to do things that make it easier to accept your > change if there are any (sometimes it's just a case of waiting). Look > at how frequently the relevant maintainers tend to respond, at what the > previous review comments have been and also consider the possibility > that people might take holidays or just be busy. > Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that you are not busy or might be on holidays. I guess I just got anxious due the merge window being close... Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |