On Monday 21 July 2014 17:11:12 Chanwoo Choi wrote: > > work to address the comments and do testing. > > OK, I'll add this patch. > But, I have a question. > > Your patch add following compatible string. > "s3c64100-adc" is right? > > static const struct of_device_id exynos_adc_match[] = { > { > + .compatible = "samsung,s3c64100-adc", > + .data = &exynos_adc_s3c64xx_data, > + }, { There is a typo, thanks for spotting this. It should be "samsung,s3c6410-adc", not "samsung,s3c64100-adc". > > b) For the "compatible" string, I think it makes sense to set a fallback to > > "samsung,exynos-adc-v2" in the case for exynos3250, making the DT > > representation > > > > compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-adc", "samsung,exynos-adc-v2"; > > > > It's not entirely compatible because of the addition of the clock, but > > since the register layout is the same, I think it still make sense. > > OK, I'll add it in exynos3250.dtsi as following: > > adc: adc@126C0000 { > - compatible = "samsung,exynos-adc-v3"; > + compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-adc", > + "samsung,exynos-adc-v2"; > reg = <0x126C0000 0x100>, <0x10020718 0x4>; > interrupts = <0 137 0>; > - clock-names = "adc", "sclk_tsadc"; > + clock-names = "adc", "sclk"; > clocks = <&cmu CLK_TSADC>, <&cmu CLK_SCLK_TSADC>; > #io-channel-cells = <1>; > io-channel-ranges; Ok, looks good. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html