On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2014 01:23:15 Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> If don't add new compatible including specific exynos version,
>> I would add new 'adc-needs-sclk' property with existing 'exynos-adc-v2'
>> compatible name.
>>
>>
>> Dear Naveen, Tomasz,
>>
>> If existing exynos-adc driver add just one property for 'sclk_adc'
>> as following, exynos-adc could not include the exynos version
>> in compatible name.
>>
>> I need your opinion about it.
>>
>> adc: adc@126C0000 {
>> compatible = "samsung,exynos-adc-v2";
>> reg = <0x126C0000 0x100>, <0x10020718 0x4>;
>> interrupts = <0 137 0>;
>> clock-names = "adc", "sclk_adc";
>> clocks = <&cmu CLK_TSADC>, <&cmu CLK_SCLK_TSADC>;
>> + adc-needs-sclk;
>> #io-channel-cells = <1>;
>> io-channel-ranges;
>> }
>
> How about just making it an optional clock? That would be much
> easier because then you can simply see if the clock itself is
> there and use it, or otherwise ignore it.
The v1 of this patchset[1] got the clock of 'sclk_adc' but if the dt node
of ADC in dtsi file didn't include 'sclk_adc', print just warning message
without stopping probe as following:
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/10/710
+ info->sclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "sclk_adc");
+ if (IS_ERR(info->sclk)) {
+ dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed getting sclk clock, err = %ld\n",
+ PTR_ERR(info->sclk));
+ info->sclk = NULL;
+ }
But, Tomasz Figa suggested the method[2] of this patchset(v6).
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/11/189
Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
