Hi Naveen, Please see my comments inline. On 15.07.2014 14:20, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: > This patch modifies the spi-s3c64xx.c driver to fetch the > Chip select or Slave select gpio line property "cs-gpios" > from SPI node instead of "controller_data" subnode. > > Rename the property "cs-gpio" to "cs-gpios" in accordance > with the SPI core. Such that s3c64xx.c can use spi->cs_gpio > instead of parsing the property in the driver. > > Update the dt-bindings ion spi/spi-samsung.txt > > Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > This patch is a rework of the change @ > http://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg34500.html > > I'm not sure if i can carry forward the other Signed-offs and Tested-bys [snip] > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c > index 75a5696..72bfba6 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c > @@ -764,12 +764,6 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *s3c64xx_get_slave_ctrldata( > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > } > > - data_np = of_get_child_by_name(slave_np, "controller-data"); > - if (!data_np) { > - dev_err(&spi->dev, "child node 'controller-data' not found\n"); > - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > - } Do you need to move this code block? > - > cs = kzalloc(sizeof(*cs), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!cs) { > of_node_put(data_np); > @@ -777,13 +771,17 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *s3c64xx_get_slave_ctrldata( > } > > /* The CS line is asserted/deasserted by the gpio pin */ > - if (sdd->cs_gpio) > - cs->line = of_get_named_gpio(data_np, "cs-gpio", 0); > + cs->line = spi->cs_gpio; > > if (!gpio_is_valid(cs->line)) { This check is wrong when native chip select is used. However I'm not sure how to distinguish this from a situation when invalid GPIO was specified, because cs->line will be -ENOENT in both cases. Mark, any ideas? > dev_err(&spi->dev, "chip select gpio is not specified or invalid\n"); > kfree(cs); > - of_node_put(data_np); > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + } > + > + data_np = of_get_child_by_name(slave_np, "controller-data"); > + if (!data_np) { > + dev_err(&spi->dev, "child node 'controller-data' not found\n"); > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > } > > @@ -1077,7 +1075,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > sdd->sfr_start = mem_res->start; > sdd->cs_gpio = true; > if (pdev->dev.of_node) { > - if (!of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "cs-gpio", NULL)) > + if (!of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "cs-gpios", NULL)) > sdd->cs_gpio = false; What is this boolean flag used for now? If cs->line now either contains a valid GPIO or a negative error, why gpio_is_valid() couldn't be used on it? I believe it was done correctly in previous version. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |