2014-07-01 17:09 GMT+02:00 Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > +Olof who posted the patch that Yuvaraj referenced. > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Yuvaraj Cd <yuvaraj.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:27 PM, James Cameron <quozl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:44:29PM -0700, Bing Zhao wrote: >>>> I may have missed something, but doesn't the MMC_POWER_OFF and >>>> MMC_POWER_ON|UP handling in controller driver help? >>>> Anyway the clocks/GPIOs/regulators are sort of platform >>>> dependent. Would it be better putting it in /arch/arm/mach-xxxxx/? >>> >>> Wouldn't device tree for mmc be better? >> I have come across same problem.Below is the thread in which more >> discussions happened on this. >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/312444/ >> I am adding few more those who are interested in this solution. > > Thanks to Yuvaraj for referencing the old thread. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg26564.html Quite a read indeed Meanwhile I got a working prototype for omap_hsmmc/mwifiex based on this series: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg27228.html I will post my patches, once the FDT format is set in stone, and Ulf has had some time to work on v2 of his series. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |