Hi,
On Monday, July 14, 2014 11:54:48 AM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Kukjin,
>
> On 25.06.2014 13:52, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Due to recent consolidation of Exynos suspend and cpuidle code, some
> > parts of suspend and resume sequences are executed two times, once from
> > exynos_pm_syscore_ops and then from exynos_cpu_pm_notifier() and thus it
> > breaks suspend, at least on Exynos4-based boards.
> >
> > This patch fixes the issue by removing exynos_pm_syscore_ops completely
> > and making the code rely only on CPU PM notifier.
> >
> > Tested on Exynos4210-based Trats board.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 23 ++++-------------------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - rebased onto Kukjin's fixes branch.
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> > index 202ca73..f23cc77 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> > @@ -364,11 +364,6 @@ early_wakeup:
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > -static struct syscore_ops exynos_pm_syscore_ops = {
> > - .suspend = exynos_pm_suspend,
> > - .resume = exynos_pm_resume,
> > -};
> > -
> > /*
> > * Suspend Ops
> > */
> > @@ -438,22 +433,13 @@ static int exynos_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
> >
> > switch (cmd) {
> > case CPU_PM_ENTER:
> > - if (cpu == 0) {
> > - exynos_pm_central_suspend();
> > - if (read_cpuid_part_number() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
> > - exynos_cpu_save_register();
> > - }
> > + if (cpu == 0)
> > + exynos_pm_suspend();
> > break;
> >
> > case CPU_PM_EXIT:
> > - if (cpu == 0) {
> > - if (read_cpuid_part_number() ==
> > - ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
> > - scu_enable(S5P_VA_SCU);
> > - exynos_cpu_restore_register();
> > - }
> > - exynos_pm_central_resume();
> > - }
> > + if (cpu == 0)
> > + exynos_pm_resume();
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -478,6 +464,5 @@ void __init exynos_pm_init(void)
> > tmp |= ((0xFF << 8) | (0x1F << 1));
> > __raw_writel(tmp, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK);
> >
> > - register_syscore_ops(&exynos_pm_syscore_ops);
> > suspend_set_ops(&exynos_suspend_ops);
> > }
> >
>
> Please consider this patch for next fixes pull request. Without it
> suspend/resume is broken for Exynos4 and probably other SoCs. This patch
> just restores the sequence from before the patch moving things to PM
> notifier, so I don't think it should need any special treatment.
Your patch fixes the regression and is a step in the good direction but it
seems that it needs a bit more work:
Your patch adds to cpuidle AFTR code path restoring of exynos_core_save and
exynos5_sys_save registers without saving them first (restoring is done
through exynos_pm_resume() which is used by both suspend and cpuidle while
saving is done through exynos_pm_prepare() which is used only by suspend).
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
