As exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init function have just one lines of code for registering platform devices. We can move these lines to exynos_dt_machine_init and delete exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init function. This will help in reducing lines of code in exynos.c, making it more cleaner. Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- This patch is part of exynos-cleanup series v6 [1]. Just respinning after resolving merge conflicts on latest kgene/for-next. [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/10/338 arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 18 ++++-------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c index 2a43a17..99dc5aa 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c @@ -175,17 +175,6 @@ static struct platform_device exynos_cpuidle = { .id = -1, }; -void __init exynos_cpuidle_init(void) -{ - if (soc_is_exynos4210() || soc_is_exynos5250()) - platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle); -} - -void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void) -{ - platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0); -} - void __iomem *sysram_base_addr; void __iomem *sysram_ns_base_addr; @@ -335,10 +324,11 @@ static void __init exynos_dt_machine_init(void) if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP)) exynos_sysram_init(); - if (!of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5420")) - exynos_cpuidle_init(); + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4210") || + of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250")) + platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle); - exynos_cpufreq_init(); + platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0); of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL); } -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |