On 10 July 2014 09:08, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Replaced the "disable-wp" into host's quirks.
> (Because the slot-node is removed at dt-file.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Jaehoon,
I plan to carry these patches through my mmc tree and I will share
them through a PR from an immutable branch with the ARM SoC guys.
Please tell me if you have any concern with this set up.
Now, while I was applying this patch, I found it had checkpatch
errors. Please run checkpatch and resend a new version.
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 1ac227c..a3ccd07 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ static int dw_mci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> int gpio_ro = mmc_gpio_get_ro(mmc);
>
> /* Use platform get_ro function, else try on board write protect */
> - if (slot->quirks & DW_MCI_SLOT_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT)
> + if (slot->host->quirks & DW_MCI_SLOT_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT)
> read_only = 0;
> else if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(gpio_ro))
> read_only = gpio_ro;
> @@ -2006,12 +2006,7 @@ static struct device_node *dw_mci_of_find_slot_node(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
> static struct dw_mci_of_slot_quirks {
> char *quirk;
> int id;
> -} of_slot_quirks[] = {
> - {
> - .quirk = "disable-wp",
> - .id = DW_MCI_SLOT_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT,
> - },
> -};
> +} of_slot_quirks[] = {};
>
> static int dw_mci_of_get_slot_quirks(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
> {
> @@ -2238,6 +2233,9 @@ static struct dw_mci_of_quirks {
> {
> .quirk = "broken-cd",
> .id = DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION,
> + },{
> + .quirk = "disable-wp",
> + .id = DW_MCI_SLOT_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT,
> },
> };
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
