Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 01 July 2014 19:21:16 Kukjin Kim wrote: > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig > > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ config PLAT_SAMSUNG > > > > config PLAT_S5P > > bool > > - depends on (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210) > > + depends on ARCH_S5PV210 > > default y > > select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB > > select ARM_VIC > > @@ -78,14 +78,14 @@ config SAMSUNG_CLKSRC > > used by newer systems such as the S3C64XX. > > > > config S5P_CLOCK > > - def_bool (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210) > > + def_bool ARCH_S5PV210 > > help > > Support common clock part for ARCH_S5P and ARCH_EXYNOS SoCs > > > > # options for IRQ support > > > > config S5P_IRQ > > - def_bool (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210) > > + def_bool ARCH_S5PV210 > > help > > Support common interrupt part for ARCH_S5P SoCs > > > > @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ config S3C_GPIO_TRACK > > > > config S5P_DEV_UART > > def_bool y > > - depends on (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210) > > + depends on ARCH_S5PV210 > > > > # ADC driver > > > > I guess the next logical step would be to either remove these entirely > after the move to DT-only ARCH_S5PV210 obsoletes them, or to move the > code back to mach-s5pv210, right? > Yeah both are possible, but the latter would be more possible at this moment, I think. I will cleanup stuff in plat-samsung as you suggested :-) > > > config SAMSUNG_DMADEV > > bool "Use legacy Samsung DMA abstraction" > > - depends on CPU_S5PV210 || CPU_S5PC100 || ARCH_S3C64XX > > + depends on CPU_S5PV210 || ARCH_S3C64XX > > select DMADEVICES > > default y > > help > > It would be good to just kill this one off now, as nothing uses it > any more, but that's also a separate patch. > Maybe it is still used for s5pv210 and s3c64xx? If I misunderstand your comments, please kindly let me know. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html