Hi Sachin, On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Vivek, > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Vivek, >> >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi Sachin, >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> EHCI and OHCI drivers on Exynos platforms do not work without their >>>> corresponding SoC specific phy drivers. Hence it makes no sense to >>>> keep these phy drivers as user selectable. Instead select them from >>>> the respective USB configs to make things easier for the end user. >>>> While at it enable 5250 phy for Exynos 5420 SoC too. >> >> <snip> >> >>>> + select PHY_EXYNOS4210_USB2 if CPU_EXYNOS4210 >>>> + select PHY_EXYNOS4X12_USB2 if (SOC_EXYNOS4212 || SOC_EXYNOS4412) >>>> + select PHY_EXYNOS5250_USB2 if (SOC_EXYNOS5250 || SOC_EXYNOS5420) >>> >>> also || SOC_EXYNOS5800 >>> same controller present on Exynos5800 too. > > Just checked that SOC_EXYNOS5800 is dependent on SOC_EXYNOS5420. Hence > explicit option for SOC_EXYNOS5800 is redundant here. Will keep it as is. Aah ! right, it's fine then. Sorry for the noise. -- Best Regards Vivek Gautam Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore India -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |